Advertisement Picture








Birdwatch News Archive


Recaptured birds, like this Ruby-crowned Kinglet, are often territorial residents, in better condition and less likely to be injured than other individuals by mist nets. Photo: Duncan Wright (commons.wikimedia.org).
Recaptured birds, like this Ruby-crowned Kinglet, are often territorial residents, in better condition and less likely to be injured than other individuals by mist nets. Photo: Duncan Wright (commons.wikimedia.org).Enlarge image

Mist netting shown to be safe


Posted on: 30 Jun 2011

The first large scale study into bird netting, has shown the risks of injury to be minimal.

Capturing birds using mist nets to study behaviour, movement or the demographics of a species is one of the most common research techniques in ornithology, yet until now there have been no large scale studies into the risks mist nets pose to birds.

Researchers, led by Erica Spotswood from the University of California at Berkeley, used a dataset of over 345,000 records to evaluate the risks of mist netting. Data was obtained from organisations across the United States and Canada to assess the risk factors which could increase rates of injury or mortality including bird size, age, frequency of capture and the role of predators.

The results revealed that birds are rarely injured or killed by mist nets. Of 620,997 captures the percentage of incidents of injury amounting to 0.59 per cent while only 0.23 per cent of captures resulted in mortality. The authors then began to analyse risk factors which could lead to increased incidents.

Spotswood first discovered the lack of research into mist netting while applying to study the Gray-green Fruit Dove in French Polynesia. When concerned officials denied her permit and questioned the safety of capturing birds with mist nets Spotswood realised that no comprehensive study quantifying the frequency of bird injuries during mist netting existed.

“I was very surprised to find that no study of this kind existed, because mist netting has been around since the 1950s and is an extremely widely used and common technique for monitoring bird populations," said Spotswood. "In the United States at least one million new birds are banded each year at several hundred bird observatories around the country."

The authors compiled a dataset of documented bird injuries and mortalities from 22 bird banding organisations across the United States and Canada, resulting in a dataset of over 345,000 records of capture, spanning more than 20 years of research and featuring 188 species of birds.

“Using this enormous dataset we could consider not only the rate of injuries, but could ask which species are most at risk and what kinds of incident are most common,” said Spotswood. “What began as an inquiry for a permit application ended up evolving into something we feel will be of value to the scientific community.”

The team also analysed how repeated capture can affect the likelihood of incident and were surprised to discover that birds which were captured more frequently were less at risk than birds which were only captured once. The team suggest this is because frequently captured birds are more likely to be established adults with territories, which are commonly in better condition than birds that don’t have territories.

Finally the team found that birds which were released with an injury were just as likely to be recaptured as birds without, meaning that injured birds continue to survive in similar numbers to uninjured birds, meaning the long term impact of mist netting is minimal.

“A lot of wildlife research requires that animals are captured and handled in order to study populations, demographics, behaviour or movement, yet the process can be stressful to animals. For both ethical reasons and the sake of the research, it is important to make absolutely sure any risks are minimized,” concluded Spotswood.

“Our study fills in an important gap in understanding by evaluating one of the most commonly used methods in ornithological research. We have shown that when banders follow good practices, incidents are rare. We hope that the results of this paper will be widely read by the banding community and that it will help researchers minimize any risk of incident.”

Reference: Spotswood, E N, Roesch Goodman, K, Carlisle, J, Cormier, R L, Humple, D L, Rousseau, J, Guers, S L and Barton, G. 2011. How safe is mist netting? Evaluating the risk of injury and mortality to birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution: DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00123.x




Your Comments

Tell us what you think...

You must be logged in to leave a comment. You can log in here.
If you don't have a user account please register.

Other News

Threatened African rainforest declared a National Park

Posted: 26 Sep 2016
The West African Gola National Forest – which teems with threatened wildlife and is an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area – has been fully protected by the Liberian government.

Read more…


Government answers petitioners: buzzards can be killed under licence

Posted: 25 Sep 2016
The UK Government has responded to a petition against killing Common Buzzards which garnered nearly 12,000 signatures, saying it intends to allow Pheasant breeders to kill them.

Read more…


Namibia becomes seabird friendly

Posted: 24 Sep 2016
A law has been passed in Namibia to protect 30,000 seabirds from death by trawling or long-line fishing in what has been the world’s worst fishery for by-catch.

Read more…


Scientists get closer to establishing colours of fossil bird feathers

Posted: 23 Sep 2016
An international team of scientists led by the University of Manchester is uncovering the true colours of extinct birds and dinosaurs.

Read more…


October's Birdwatch on sale now!

Posted: 22 Sep 2016
As the new issue hits the shops, we look forward to peak autumn migration, keep the pressure on the anti-driven grouse shooting campaign and present a new comprehensive bird list for the region.

Read more…


  2 3 4 >

Back to News Listing